I think the portrait of my mother is amusing. It’s an accurate depiction of her subversive character of a misfit. I don’t feel this in my Aspen show. It is more a return to elemental ideas. More epic and abstract. The surprise lies in the departure from the topics of my other works. The topic of nature in the waves and rocks, and the opposing/complimentary sky cult images of the rockets.
It was simply how I felt at that moment. I don’t normally think about these things. Sounds very cliche, but that’s more an internal process, more an intuitive way to choose how you want to express the ideas. Especially when it comes to the idea of America, people have ideological obsessions that I didn’t want to accommodate.
Blood Bath was shot in Ukraine with people pretending to be soldiers, before the actual war started, the impulse to go there and photograph those people was partly journalistic, I was curious to meet the people who were doing that and on a more intuitive level I knew they were in touch with something more archetypical, maybe a sense that there’s perpetual violence everywhere and very harsh transformational events in the world and we are too left-brained and numb to feel the intensity of what is happening.
People rationalise things to justify them or deal with them.
I think I was interested in the fact that in photography it is possible to create a reality or make it look like a documentary although it was staged. I was aware that the conflict between Russia and Ukraine had been going for over 6 years prior to Putin invading but at the time of shooting I never thought things would escalate to this extent. The photos probably deal with deception, and for that reason maybe they are a little bit of a psyop. The other series shown alongside the war images was shot originally as a commercial commission for Supreme. It’s a monkey playing with a camera, a stand-in for the photographer, maybe it was a reminder of the people and process through which images are fabricated.
I love Richard Kern.
I am friends with Richard, so I can say we have a lot in common. We have the same interests and agree on lot of things. I don’t know if it shows in our work though. We both didn’t originally start with fashion photography, but do commissioned fashion work. I guess we both did pornography to some extent as well.
Originally I was drawn to the subjects by a sincere interest, I wanted to photograph giant rockets and landscapes in the tradition of Ansel Adams which I was looking at a lot. The subject matter itself is transcendent and larger than life, which makes photographing it from the perspective of a single human being with a camera a humbling experience and the images themselves end up looking very recognizable almost as an archetype because there aren’t a million ways to photograph a rocket if you actually want to see the rocket. The camera has to be in a protective cage a few miles away, you have to use a very long lens, those are the conditions that make the “genre” instantly recognizable. But the rocket photos in the exhibition, to me at least, are a little bit like Monet painting the Rouen cathedral at different times of the day. There’s subtle shifts in light, atmospheric conditions, cloud reflections, glare, etc., and I think the work becomes about human perception and nature.
{laughs} I just noticed that I compared myself to Monet… that’s cool.
Photographing landscapes was an introspective process, as you are in a receiving mode. There’s something transcendental in photographing a subject that doesn’t easily submit to the lens. It’s different from transgression, where breaking boundaries often involves defiance. Kind of a peaceful experience.
—